Prepare for the Certified Scrum Master Test. Use flashcards and multiple choice questions with hints and explanations. Ace your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


How is the Sprint Review characterized?

  1. As a formal presentation session

  2. As a collaborative working session

  3. As a performance appraisal meeting

  4. As a financial review

The correct answer is: As a collaborative working session

The Sprint Review is characterized as a collaborative working session because it provides a platform for the Scrum Team and stakeholders to come together to discuss the work completed during the Sprint. The focus is on reviewing the product increment and gathering feedback that can inform future work, promoting transparency and adaptation. This collaborative nature allows for engagement and discussion among team members and stakeholders, encouraging a shared understanding of the progress and direction of the project. The intention is to foster a spirit of cooperation and ensure alignment toward project goals, making it a crucial part of the Scrum framework. While there may be presentations of work done, the essence of the Sprint Review is not about a formal presentation but rather open dialogue and collaboration. This differentiates it from a performance appraisal, which centers on evaluating individual contributions, or a financial review, which would focus on budgets and expenditures rather than product development progress.