Certified Scrum Master Practice Test

During the Sprint Retrospective, what should action items ensure?

1. They require additional team members' input

2. They are within the team’s capacity to take on

3. They are implemented without change

4. They focus solely on individual performance

The correct answer is: They are within the team’s capacity to take on

The chosen answer, which emphasizes that action items should be within the team’s capacity to take on, is accurate because it aligns with the principles of effective Agile and Scrum practice. During a Sprint Retrospective, the team reflects on past performance and identifies areas for improvement. Action items derived from these discussions should be realistic and attainable, ensuring that the team can commit to and execute them in future sprints. This focus on capacity is crucial for maintaining morale and fostering a culture of continuous improvement, as overburdening the team can lead to frustration and decreased productivity. In contrast, the other options do not support the core goals of the Sprint Retrospective. Requiring additional team members' input might lead to unnecessary delays and complicate the clarity and focus of the action items. Stating that items should be implemented without change contradicts the essence of continuous improvement, which involves adaptability and responsiveness to team needs. Lastly, focusing solely on individual performance can foster a competitive mentality rather than a collaborative environment, which is counterproductive in a Scrum framework that is designed to enhance team dynamics and collective accountability.